🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.